|
[ Country-by-Country Reports ]
THE MALDIVES (TIER 2)
[Extracted from U.S. State Dept Trafficking in Persons Report, June 2009]
The
Maldives is primarily a destination country for migrant workers from
Bangladesh and India trafficked into forced labor and, to a lesser extent, a
destination country for women trafficked for the purpose of commercial sexual
exploitation. An unknown number of the 80,000 foreign workers currently
working in the Maldives – primarily in the construction and service
sectors –face fraudulent recruitment practices, confinement,
confiscation of identity and travel documents, debt bondage, or general
slave-like conditions. Twenty thousand of these workers do not have legal status
in the country, yet both legal and illegal workers were vulnerable to
conditions of forced labor. While some migrant workers have paid agents up to
$4,000 for the opportunity to work in the Maldives, most pay $2,000; these
high fees may create vulnerabilities for debt bondage, as noted in a recent
ILO report on forced labor. A small number of women from Sri Lanka, Thailand,
India, and China reportedly are trafficked to Male, the capital, for purposes
of commercial sexual exploitation. A small number of underage Maldivian girls
reportedly are trafficked to Male from other islands for domestic servitude.
Trafficking offenders usually fall into two groups: wealthy families that
subject domestic servants to forced labor; and some of the 200 registered employment
agents who bring low-skilled migrant workers to the Maldives under false
terms of employment and subject them to conditions of forced labor upon
arrival.
The
Government of the Maldives does not fully comply with the minimum standards
for the elimination of trafficking; however, it is making significant efforts
to do so. During the reporting period, the government acknowledged the human
trafficking problem on the Maldives and began taking steps to confront it
effectively, though overall efforts were insufficient.
Recommendations for The Maldives: Draft and enact legislation prohibiting and
punishing all forms of trafficking in persons; develop and implement
systematic procedures for government officials to identify victims of
trafficking among vulnerable groups such as undocumented migrants and women
in prostitution; ensure that identified victims of trafficking are provided
necessary assistance and are not penalized for unlawful acts committed as a
direct result of their being trafficked; increase efforts to investigate and
prosecute trafficking offenses and convict and sentence trafficking
offenders; raise public awareness to human trafficking through media
campaigns; and take steps to ensure that employers and labor brokers are not
abusing labor recruitment or sponsorship processes in order to subject
migrant workers to forced labor.
Prosecution
The Government of the Maldives undertook minimal anti-trafficking law
enforcement efforts during the last year. Although the Maldives does not have
an anti-human trafficking law, its constitution prohibits forced labor and
slavery and some laws covering sexual offenses and child protection can be
used to prosecute sex trafficking and child trafficking offenses. The sexual
offenses statute – Section 173 of the Rules of Procedure adopted in
February 2008 – prescribes penalties of up to 15 years’
imprisonment, which are sufficiently stringent and commensurate with those
prescribed for other grave crimes, such as rape. While overall awareness of
the Maldives’ trafficking problem seemed low among law enforcement
personnel, the government provided them with some training in the recognition
of trafficking victims. These officials, however, did not vigorously
investigate possible cases of labor trafficking. The government prosecuted
one case of forced labor during the year. A migrant worker had been chained
in a small room for days and let out only for work; his employer was
convicted and sentenced to only four months’ imprisonment. A case of
suspected transnational sex trafficking was investigated, but the case was
dropped due to lack of evidence.
Protection
The Maldivian government made no discernable efforts to identify or assist
victims of trafficking for labor exploitation. Over the year, there were
reported cases of foreign workers suffering from conditions of fraudulent
recruitment, confinement, withheld pay, physical abuse, poor living
conditions, and even debt bondage; however, authorities’ efforts to
identify trafficking victims among these exploited workers were weak. The
government provided no services, such as shelter, counseling, medical care,
or legal aid, to foreign or Maldivian victims of trafficking. When workers in
distress sought assistance from the government, they were returned to their
countries of origin, as the government lacked adequate resources to support
them. The government’s general policy for dealing with trafficking
victims was to get them out of the country as quickly as possible, noting
that deportation is less costly than incarceration. Two foreign women
identified by police as sex trafficking victims in 2008 were provided
temporary shelter before being repatriated with the help of their home
country’s diplomatic mission in Male; there was no criminal prosecution
related to their exploitation. There were no reported investigations of
internal trafficking of Maldivian or transnational sex trafficking.
Authorities did not encourage victims to participate in the investigation or
prosecution of trafficking offenses and did not provide foreign victims with
legal alternatives to their removal to countries where they might face
hardship or retribution. The government did not ensure that victims of
trafficking were not penalized for unlawful acts committed as a direct result
of their being trafficked, though there were no reports during the reporting
period of the government deliberately punishing trafficking victims.
Prevention
The Maldivian government made minimal efforts to prevent human trafficking
over the reporting period. The government conducted one anti-trafficking
informational campaign, however, in January 2008, which attempted to educate
the public on the provisions of the 2008 Employment Law. Various government
ministries and agencies lacked any mechanism – such as a committee or
plan of action – for coordination on anti-trafficking matters. However,
various ministries were in frequent contact and relied on their personal
relationships rather than a formal mechanism for contact. The government did
not take any measures to reduce the substantial demand for forced labor on
the islands, though it did start operations of a Labor Tribunal that will
address the main form of trafficking in the country. The Maldives has not
ratified the 2000 UN TIP Protocol.
|