|
[ Country-by-Country Reports ]
GUYANA (TIER 2 Watch List)
[Extracted from U.S. State Dept Trafficking in Persons Report, June 2008]
Guyana is a source, transit, and destination country for men,
women, and children trafficked for the purposes of commercial sexual
exploitation and forced labor. While official reports of human trafficking
may be limited, most trafficking appears to take place in remote mining camps
in the country’s interior. Amerindian girls are trafficked to brothels
near the mining camps and to coastal areas for sexual exploitation and
domestic servitude. Young Amerindian men are exploited under forced labor
conditions in mining and logging camps. Some women and girls trafficked into
brothels in the interior are from northern Brazil. Reporting from other
nations suggests Guyanese women and girls are trafficked for sexual
exploitation to neighboring countries such as Barbados, Trinidad and Tobago,
Brazil, Suriname, Venezuela, and that Guyanese men and boys are subject to
labor exploitation in construction and agriculture in these same countries.
Trafficking victims from Suriname, Brazil, and Venezuela transit Guyana en route
to Caribbean destinations.
The Government of Guyana does not fully comply with the minimum
standards for the elimination of trafficking; however, it is making
significant efforts to do so. While the government has undertaken a
commendable initiative to increase public awareness of the dangers of human
trafficking through a nationwide outreach campaign and advertising of its
anti-trafficking hotline, Guyana is placed on Tier 2 Watch List for a second
consecutive year for failing to provide evidence of increasing efforts to
combat trafficking, particularly in the area of law enforcement actions
against trafficking offenders.
Recommendations for
Guyana:
Increase efforts to investigate, prosecute, convict, and sentence trafficking
offenders; confront trafficking complicity by public officials; utilize
proactive police strategies such as brothel raids to rescue victims from
trafficking situations; provide greater victim assistance; and expand
anti-trafficking training for police and magistrates.
Prosecution
The Government of Guyana made only limited progress in law enforcement
efforts against traffickers over the last year. The government prohibits all
forms of trafficking through its comprehensive Combating of Trafficking in
Persons Act, which became law in 2005, and prescribes punishments ranging
from three years’ to life imprisonment, depending on whether the
defendant is convicted on summary judgment or indictment. Such penalties are
sufficiently stringent and commensurate with those for other grave crimes, such
as rape. However, the government has yet to produce an anti-trafficking
conviction under this 2005 law. Since June 2007, the government initiated six
trafficking investigations, which is level with the number of investigations
reported for 2006. There were no government efforts to investigate or address
labor trafficking crimes, despite NGO reports of exploitation and abuse in
the nation’s mining and timber camps. In October 2007, a female suspect
was formally charged with trafficking two teenagers for purposes of sexual
exploitation. The defendant was freed on bail, and is scheduled to appear in
court in June.
Another trafficking investigation involves allegations against a policeman.
Prosecutors addressed five cases which had been languishing in court for
years by dismissing them. Prosecutors report that police and magistrates
remained unfamiliar with the country’s anti-trafficking law, and cases
tried in the capital moved at a slow pace due to judicial backlog; this
excessive delay may have discouraged some victims from pursuing their
traffickers. Trafficking cases also suffered from a lack of coordination
between police, who receive victim complaints and prosecute cases in lower
courts, and the Director of Public Prosecutions, which prosecutes more serious
matters. Most trafficking prosecutions are handled by untrained police
prosecutors, and are routinely adjourned and dismissed. The government also
has reported that prosecutions of trafficking offenders may be more difficult
in rural and interior areas, where infrequent court sessions and untrained
magistrates lead to the dismissal of cases. Technical training would assist
the government’s police and prosecutorial efforts. The Guyanese
government in February committed to a British-led reform project that
addresses some of these skill gaps. Use of proactive police techniques and
unannounced inspections of labor camps in the nation’s interior also
would very likely lead to greater results and more victim rescues. In July
2007, the government added human trafficking to its list of most serious
crimes, but the effect of this pronouncement on the handling of trafficking
cases is unclear. There is reliable evidence of public complicity in
trafficking by lower-level officials. A corruption-related charge filed against
a police officer in 2006 was dismissed in May 2007 for want of prosecution.
Protection
The Government of Guyana sustained a modest level of victim assistance during
the reporting period. The government operates no shelters for trafficking
victims, but it included limited funding for anti-trafficking NGOs in its
2008 budget. These NGOs provide shelter, counseling, and medical assistance
for victims of abuse, including trafficking victims, but are limited to
coverage in the nation’s capital. The government also provides medical
attention and funding for the repatriation of foreign trafficking victims.
Government officials have worked with IOM on victim identification, and
additional anti-trafficking training would assist the government’s
efforts, particularly with respect to identifying minors in prostitution as
trafficking victims. There were no reports of victims being penalized for
unlawful acts committed as a direct result of being trafficked. Guyanese
authorities encourage victims to assist in the investigation and prosecution
of their traffickers, but some victims did not testify due to long delays in
the judicial system and for fear of reprisal from their traffickers. The
Guyanese government did not provide legal alternatives to the removal of foreign
victims to countries where they face hardship or retribution.
Prevention
The government increased prevention efforts during the reporting period.
Senior government officials publicly condemned human trafficking, and the
government conducted a widespread educational and awareness-raising campaign,
which reached more than 50 communities and 5,000 citizens across the country.
The government also established an interagency anti-trafficking task force,
and increased advertising for an anti-trafficking call line to assist
potential victims. It did not, however, carry out any efforts to reduce
demand for commercial sex acts during the reporting period.
|